[retronet-core] RetroNet Services Core LAN…

[Grant Taylor]

On Sep 18, 2018, at 9:36 PM, John P. Willis via retronet-core <retronet-core at mailman.chivanet.org> wrote:
> I think this makes a lot more sense. Get onto the real configuration as soon
> as possible, to avoid reconfiguring things and causing lots of pain later.

Agreed.

This probably means that we need to think more about addressing and how we want to deploy.

I see WireGuard VPNs and VXLAN link-nets, both /30s to come from somewhere. There is also RetroNet Services core LAN (100.64.1.0/24).

Members will have 100.64.$Member.0/24.

> How would this affect any potential services being offered by RN (the service 
> provider) that make use of unroutable protocols?

I wasn’t aware of any services that RetroNet Services would offer over an unroutable protocol. What are you thinking about?

L2 connections will be member to member and not touch RetroNet Services.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2338 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.chivanet.org/pipermail/retronet-core/attachments/20180918/3d9fde5d/attachment.bin>